Write For Us

Why the Ivy League Needs to Admit More Students


© Yana Paskova / Getty

By Alia Wong, The Atlantic

In the spring, Yale University sent the last of its rejection letters to more than 35,000 teenagers who had applied for one of the roughly 1,550 slots in its freshman class. Like other top colleges, Yale is extremely selective: Just 6 percent of students who vied for admission in Class of 2022 were accepted.

On Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Justice and Education departments are investigating Yale for allegedly discriminating against Asian American applicants. The announcement comes just weeks before opening arguments in a court case that similarly accuses Harvard of bias and is part of a heightened effort on the part of the Trump administration to crack down on race-based affirmative action at the nation’s elite colleges. And Princeton has faced similar accusations as well, including in a federal complaint that the Obama administration investigated before concluding in 2015 that it couldn’t prove wrongdoing.

How these investigations will play out has yet to be determined—both Harvard and Yale fervently deny the charges. But regardless, one thing is already self-evident: Elite-college admissions are in need of reform—a radical rethinking of the process by which these institutions pick whom to admit and turn away. Harvard and Yale don’t have to be so selective that ultimately the way they choose applicants comes under so much public (and legal) scrutiny.

These affirmative-action-related complaints wouldn’t have garnered this much traction had the country’s top colleges endeavored to be less, not more, selective. Had they not sought to keep their admissions rates consistently low—well beneath 10 percent throughout most of the Ivy League—despite a growing U.S. population and rising college-attendance rates. Had they not, directly or indirectly, conspired to thrive off of and fuel a higher-education culture that, in the words of The Atlantic contributor Matthew Stewart, is a “brand-obsessed system.”

The total number of applications received by some schools has soared in recent years, and acceptance rates at the country’s top 50 colleges has correspondingly dropped from an average of about 36 percent to roughly 23 percent since 2006. In the Ivy League, which continues to set record-low acceptance rates with each admissions cycle, the increase in application numbers parallels rising numbers of high-school graduates, which grew from 3.1 million in 2009 to an estimated 3.6 million in 2016. Yet, the enrollment at Yale and other Ivies has remained virtually stagnant over the same period: In the 2005-06 school year, the university enrolled 1,321 undergrads and in 2016-17, that number jumped only marginally to 1,367 students.

Why are elite colleges so hesitant to add students? Part of the reason is the pursuit of selectivity, tied to the quest to top the U.S. News & World Report rankings, which factor in a school’s acceptance rate. Stewart warned of this trend in his story for The Atlantic, too. “Plummeting admissions rates of the very top schools,” he wrote, have meant that 50 colleges are today as selective as Princeton was in 1980.

But rankings aren’t not the sole culprit, of course—consumer demand also helps insulate elite colleges from efforts to become less selective. Perhaps assimilating the messages they get from college rankings, students often want to go to a school precisely because it is so selective—students at Yale, for example, are able to boast that they’re one of the 6 percent of applicants accepted to the university. As the Harvard law professor emerita Lani Guinier once wrote, the American notion of meritocracy tends to “associate selectivity with excellence.”

Yale President Peter Salovey addressed this very phenomenon this past June on a panel at the Aspen Ideas Festival. “There’s a general belief by the American public—typically in cities, but really throughout the country—that even though there are 3,500 or so colleges, it’s only eight of them worth going to,” he said. “And that’s something I think all we education leaders have to push against.”

And Yale is making small efforts to expand access by aiming to grow the size of the freshman class by about 200 students, Salovey explained.

Still, that Yale’s admission practices have come under such intense scrutiny is a reflection of the the institution’s selectivity—and of its neglect to accept more students.


Note: If you think this story need more information or correction, feel free to comment below your opinion and reaction.

Politics - U.S. Daily News: Why the Ivy League Needs to Admit More Students
Why the Ivy League Needs to Admit More Students
Politics - U.S. Daily News
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Read More Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share. STEP 2: Click the link you shared to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy