Write For Us

Trump resists Mueller interview, leaving decision on subpoena before fall elections


© Ting Shen/Xinhua/Zuma Press/TNS

By Chris Megerian and David Willman, Los Angeles Times

After months of negotiations could not secure an interview with President Donald Trump, special counsel Robert Mueller warned the president's lawyers in March that he could use a grand jury subpoena if necessary to compel his testimony.

[post_ads]That prompted a furious response from John M. Dowd, the president's lead attorney at the time.

"I told him, in no uncertain terms, if that's the route he took, he'd have a war on his hands," Dowd said.

Trump's team has increasingly signaled that he will not voluntarily answer questions as the special counsel investigates Russian meddling in the 2016 election, whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin, and if Trump subsequently obstructed the investigation.

That may give Mueller little choice but to seek a subpoena if he deems Trump's testimony critical. But getting one this summer almost certainly would spark a court battle with the president's lawyers before the November midterm elections, a prospect Mueller might want to avoid.

The impasse represents a defining juncture for a federal investigation that has clouded the Trump White House from its first day and led to criminal charges against 32 people since October, including 12 Russian intelligence officers indicted Friday on charges of hacking files of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, Democratic Party organizations and state election offices in 2016.

While Mueller has avoided the media, Trump's rage has grown, with near-daily Twitter broadsides against what he calls a "rigged witch hunt." Trump will meet Monday in Finland with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who denies the meddling even though U.S. intelligence agencies said he ordered the operation.

Rudy Giuliani, who replaced Dowd, has become the president's most vocal defender. On July 8, the former New York City mayor said on a TV talk show that Trump would meet with Mueller only if the special counsel could show a "factual basis for the investigation," a hardening of the White House position.

Legal experts questioned Giuliani's attempts to set conditions for an interview with Trump.

"That's nonsense. It's actually nonsense on stilts," said Paul Rosenzweig, who worked with the independent counsel's office that investigated President Bill Clinton in the 1990s and is now a senior fellow at the nonpartisan R Street Institute in Washington.

The only grounds required for obtaining a grand jury subpoena, Rosenzweig said, is whether a witness may have evidence germane to the investigation.

Some former prosecutors and other lawyers say they are puzzled that Mueller has not sought a subpoena to bolster his hand in securing Trump's testimony.

"We've passed the point where a sensible prosecutor, even with the president, would have said, 'OK, enough. Here's your subpoena. See you in court,''' said Harry Litman, a University of California law professor and former U.S. attorney in Pittsburgh who was appointed by Clinton. "I would never second-guess Mueller. But I'm a little surprised he didn't start proceedings on a subpoena.''
Shanlon Wu, a former prosecutor who worked with Mueller in the 1990s in the U.S. attorney's office in Washington, said he doesn't believe Mueller wants to preside over a multiyear investigation.

"I think Mueller is very conservative in terms of his approach, and he would like to not create a big legal battle'' over a subpoena, Wu said. "I think his end goal is he wants to be seen as having done this very quickly and effectively.''

The question of whether a president can be compelled to testify under oath has never been tested in the courts.

Many legal experts believe a subpoena for the president's testimony would be upheld. They point to the Supreme Court's unanimous decision on July 24, 1974, which ordered President Richard Nixon to hand over taped conversations and other materials subpoenaed by the Watergate special prosecutor.

The Oval Office tapes revealed that Nixon had attempted to cover up crimes committed by his aides. The resulting public uproar helped forge bipartisan support for impeachment hearings that had already begun in Congress, prompting Nixon to resign 16 days after the court ruling.

Clinton also was subpoenaed, but under different circumstances - and with a different result.

Two decades ago, Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel who investigated Clinton's financial dealings as governor of Arkansas, and later his sexual relations with a White House intern, negotiated for months to question the president under oath.

Starr finally obtained a subpoena in July 1998 to compel Clinton to testify to a grand jury. No sitting president had ever done so.

After further negotiations, the two sides agreed to three conditions: The questioning would be at the White House, not the courthouse. Clinton's lawyers, who would be barred from a grand jury room, would be present. And Clinton would be questioned only about the intern, Monica Lewinsky.

Starr then withdrew the subpoena, and Clinton testified for four hours from the White House on closed-circuit TV on Aug. 17. That night, he admitted on national TV to an "inappropriate relationship" but denied that he had asked anyone to "lie, hide or destroy evidence."

Starr's subsequent report to Congress accused the president of giving "perjurious, false and misleading testimony" to the grand jury.

That December, the lame-duck House Republican majority voted to impeach the president. He was acquitted in the Democratic-led Senate and served out his term.

Mueller's office declined comment for this story. Another lawyer for the president, Jay Sekulow, said only that "we continue to maintain a professional dialogue with the special counsel."

In public, however, the scorched-earth attacks by Trump and his allies have undercut support for Mueller's investigation.
A Washington Post-Schar School poll released July 11 showed support for Mueller's handling of the case dropping from 58 percent in November to 49 percent. Disapproval rose from 28 percent to 45 percent.

Negative ratings for the Mueller investigation have risen most among Republicans - 78 percent disapprove, according to the poll - but they've also inched up among independents. Disapproval among that group reached 43 percent this month, up from 30 percent in November, according to the poll.

Neil Newhouse, a Republican pollster, said Trump is unlikely to pay a political price if he refuses an interview with Mueller's team. The decision would "surprise not a single voter in the country."

"It's not going to impact his support or his disapproval one iota," Newhouse said.


Note: If you think this story need more information or correction, feel free to comment below your opinion and reaction.

Politics - U.S. Daily News: Trump resists Mueller interview, leaving decision on subpoena before fall elections
Trump resists Mueller interview, leaving decision on subpoena before fall elections
Politics - U.S. Daily News
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Read More Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share. STEP 2: Click the link you shared to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy